Yesterday, Google announced they were killing authorship via a G+ post by +John Mueller who is a Webmaster Trends Analyst for Google. Right behind it, +Eric Enge and +Mark Traphagen, both of Stone Temple Consulting, and SEO gurus, released a post about it on Search Engine Land.
Both posts gave explanations for the demise of authorship, but you have to read between the lines to find the real reasons authorship failed, and what’s next for SEO, and why it matters.
Why Authorship was Started
Google instituted authorship markup in 2011 as a way to help identify the original author of published content. The idea was to use a G+ profile as a verified digital identity and link it to blog posts that author wrote, no matter whether it was on their site or elsewhere online.
The perk of giving the verified author a mug shot next to their post in SERPs was used to encourage adoption.
But the real reason Google started authorship was to help them identify spammy content from bogus authors or folks trying to game the system, and penalize it so that it did not rank higher than higher quality content that had more authority.
In other words, authorship was never about the author.
It was about Google’s ability to serve up better search results.
Why Authorship was Doomed
It stupefies me how Google consistently gets in their own way of making something work. And yet, they make it seem like we’re not cooperating with them. Here are a couple of examples of that.
Low Adoption Rates
This is one of the reasons that Mueller gave for why authorship was working.
The Enge/Traphagen article summarized Mueller’s thoughts with this:
“Even when sites attempted to participate, they often did it incorrectly. In addition, most non-tech-savvy site owners or authors felt the markup and linking were too complex, and so were unlikely to try to implement it.”
Okay, let’s have a look at that statement.
- Google makes it difficult to implement authorship.
- Then Google complains of low adoption rates.
- Duh!
Tutorials Galore
Me and a few other folks quickly added tutorials for how to setup AuthorRank and profited handsomely from Google’s mastery of taking the simplest thing and making a convoluted mess out of it.
In fact, that’s how Mark Traphagen and I met. He was a rising star at that point, mainly over this topic.
He sternly corrected me for using the term AuthorRank. I kissed his ring and told him that he was the guru, and he had to use the correct term of authorship. I was a solo entrepreneur trying to help other folks like me, and I used any damn word I needed to so folks could find the tutorials. Come on, that’s good SEO on keyword for crying out loud! At least I’m white hat about it.
He understood, patted me on the head, and we’ve been on good terms since. And he has been the level voice of reason I’ve gone to for help reading between the lines on every message Matt Cutts put out about authorship.
Google’s Idea of Fixing the Broken System
Because they really wanted to give authorship a good experimental run, Google decided not to make it easier for more sites to integrate authorship.
Instead, Google decided that it could do a better job of just guessing who the real author was.
That “led to many well-publicized cases of mis-attribution, such as Truman Capote being shown as the author of a New York Times article 28 years after his death,” as cited by Enge/Traphagen.
Low Value to End Users
That’s the second reason Mueller gave for getting rid of author photos from Rich Snippets in search.
That’s what he said. This is what it means.
The Role of the User
End users – that’s what Google cares about.
Google’s aim has never been, and never will be, helping you promote your business.
Their goal is to deliver high quality to search to those who use Google for that purpose.
The Role of Cell Phones
And now, more end users are doing those searches on mobile devices, specifically cell phones.
Images take up precious screen space and bandwidth.
It’s more important for Google to show a title and a description than an image of an author or even an image of a video.
Lack of Clicks
Titles matter more in search.
Mueller is the analyst who watched the data for Google and compared click rates to SERPs with and without authorship snippets. According to him, images in Rich Snippets lost their value.
While Mueller didn’t explain what he meant by value, Enge/Traphagen surmised that
“Perhaps over time users had become used to seeing them and they lost their novelty.”
Is Authorship Truly Dead?
No.
Because search has become personalized, you are still likely to see the author image next to the post of someone in your G+ Circles or Gmail contacts in search.
We don’t know how much longer that will last.
Enge/Traphagen speculate:
“After three years the great Google Authorship experiment has come to an end … at least for now.”
At least for now. Tomorrow, who knows?
Google’s Always Moving Cheese
If you have authorship connected, leave it that way.
If you don’t have it connected, maybe you want to do it because Google could always change their minds, again.
Or, maybe you’ll leave well enough alone and go do the more traditional promotional routes of getting the content you create found.
Chasing Cheese Works
Every platform changes how it works and the perks or penalties they give.
If you’ve been in the online promotion game long, you’ll remember the rise and fall of Facebook business pages, the introduction of Pinterest and the subsequent whirlwind of adoption. And on and on.
Here’s what I know.
When I moved my business and content from a “me too” follower to “cutting edge” thought leader philosophy adopter, and I started chasing cheese earlier rather than later, I started making more money.
That has not changed.
Systems will come and go. Making the most of them while they are here is key.
When Not to Chase Cheese
There will always be perks and pitfalls on every platform.
Ways that work super for one business type will fall flat for another.
You have to capitalize on the cheese that make sense for you, your business, and your audience.
What Google is Pushing Today
The demise of authorship was slow. Before it completely went away, Google started giving perks sites with semantic markup, and they still are.
They’re also giving perks currently to sites that can capitalize on publishership.
And most recently, they announced SSL as a light-weight ranking factor to encourage adoption. This is the one where I drew the line. The other perks are not really all that hard to set up or chase. This one is, and comes with lots and lots of caveats and pitfalls when converting an existing site. (Building a site on SSL from the ground up is different.)
Get it or Die
For every type of cheese, there will be hype and controversy. Remember the famous words of Eric Schmidt in The New Digital Age, who said about authorship,
“Within search results, information tied to verified online profiles will be ranked higher than content without such verification, which will result in most users naturally clicking on the top (verified) results. The true cost of remaining anonymous, then, might be irrelevance.”
Yeah, I quoted him many times in an attempt to get more folks to jump on the authorship bandwagon and get some easy Google juice in the bargain. I certainly made more money from having that perk and encouraged others to do the same. I’ll still be setting up new sites with it – because I can, and Rich Snippets are still showing, at least a little.
And there will be hype over the next new thing too
And lots of folks, maybe even me, will make it sound like it’s the most important thing on the planet. I will if it makes me money and helps my clients make money with their site. Oh yes sir, you bet! That is THE bottom line, right?
So, those of us who tried to do what Google said may feel ripped off or betrayed or such.
Get over it!
Google does what’s good for Google. If you help Google do that, you’ll be rewarded for as long as that perk is available. Same with other platforms.
So, quit lamenting the death of authorship and get on board with whatever new thing makes sense for your business.
